Tuesday, September 17, 2013

What is Beauty - part 1. Barbie's multiple careers

This week and next, Lehigh University campus will have an incredible opportunity to have a wide conversation about the topic of Beauty, book ended by the lens of performing arts, and with a NYTime author. Tonight at 7pm, Jane Comfort and Company will present their work, "Beauty"

   

From the company's website:
Beauty is a provocative dance theater work exploring the American notion of female beauty. It frames the dialogue of the cultural pressures surrounding women’s physique, attire, and appearance around the quintessential image of American beauty: Barbie.
Movement vocabulary is derived from an investigation of Barbie’s limited, robotic abilities contrasted with a fully expressive dance vocabulary. Beauty includes a Barbie beauty contest and an intimate encounter between Barbie and Ken. During the course of the evening, we become acquainted with the performers as Barbie dolls, as contestants, as characters with beauty aspirations, and as the dancers behind all these personas.
Of course, this bit of information led me to some important research.

I came across a website for all of the career options that Mattel has given our fair haired creature.
Arctic Rescue Barbie
President Barbie (comes in different hair)
Swim Champion Barbie - who needs a puppy. Note the tiny pink trophy
Chef & Waitress Barbie (Apparently, she runs the entire restaurant at the same time)

Pancake Chef Barbie - specific culinary skills? or repurposed "domestic bliss" set?
This is but a sampling. Gymnast, Babysitter, Baby Doctor (with different hair styles; i.e., blonde or brunette), Nurse, Nursery School Teacher (with play set), Pet Vet (redundant?), Actress, Track Champion (these sports themed dolls must have been inspired by the Olympics), Tennis Player, Skier, Splash and Spin Dolphin Trainer (not kidding), Magician...

What was most interesting to me on see these cataloged on their merchant web site was the text below the images:
Barbie “I Can Be…” Boutique
Welcome to the Barbie I Can Be Family page! Our I Can Be Barbie line is designed to inspire your daughter to discover her dreams through a variety of empowering career-themed roles, from the nurturing Pet Vet Barbie doll to the geek-chic Computer Engineer Barbie doll.

Choose from a fabulous variety of Barbie I Can Be dolls that allow your daughter to play the part of a young girls role model! If your little girl wants to be a big screen star, she’ll love the Barbie I Can Be Movie Star doll. You’ll find exquisite examples of the many directions your girls career can take, from a talented chef to a stylish news anchor. Your daughter is sure to be inspired by the Barbie doctor, Barbie ballroom dancer, Barbie Ballerina, and other beautiful Barbie I Can Be professions.
Shop Barbie. And think pink!
 "GEEK-CHIC" gave me an idea. Don't worry Barbie, all of those careers you have tried that have left you feeling wanting for more aren't your only options. Here's the one that will fulfill all of your earthly desires and give your life direction. You're welcome.


Saturday, June 29, 2013

Inquiry Based Learning Experience

Do you know your best learning style? Do you immediately comprehend information from reading? Are you a verbal processor who has to practice restraint to let others have a chance in classroom discussion. Are you a deep-thinking introvert?

Have you been conditioned to think a certain way about how learning is measured? Are tests the only way to go because the law says so? Does project based learning really support building 21st-century skills? Do you learn better when you teach the material to someone else?

What is knowledge? What is your responsibility to knowledge (self and others?)

If this sounds like the worst writing assignment ever -- you probably haven't struggled with these questions yet, or are so overwhelmed by these questions because they face you at the end of every day. How could one possibly summarize their responses in one paper, or even one dissertation?

Since the dawn of recorded history, philosophers have wrestled with these questions. Generations of thinkers have wrestled with these questions. Students have wrestled with understanding the questions and the subsequent measure of demonstrating their comprehensive awareness of these questions.

It's exhausting, isn't it?

Why can't we just be? Well, for one thing, we have this millennial institution called, "higher learning." And we're in a state of crisis. At one point, higher education is seen as the solution that everyone needs in the creative economy. At another point, the digital age has brought an incredible access to information; almost like the breach at Helm's Deep (guess that literary reference). Behold, the MOOCs.

[Take a deep breath, hold it for 5 seconds, slowly let it out over 5 seconds. Relax your shoulders. Deepest apologies for the drama - but I'm asking for something that, for some, is a stretch...]

Each day you've been on this planet, you've learned about the world and your relationship with it. From the day you were born, you have learned through experiences. Your first lesson was compassion from your mother. You didn't read about it. You experienced it. Later in life, you learned what the word "compassion" meant in reflection of love and comfort. You may have learned deeper compassion by becoming a parent, or caring for another person. Or you may have learned about compassion by not having it when you needed it most.

What other values do we need to learn or to pass on to others? How do we express what we see, feel or understand about our world? This is not the kind of knowledge one typically demonstrates on a written exam. Last I read, there are no core curricular standards for "compassion." But this world surely needs it. So how can one acquire this knowledge, or other human values?

It is certainly the kind of knowledge one could develop in a life-long relationship with art.

Having a relationship with art does not require intensive conservatory study, hours in the dance studio, or years of solitude with paints or a keyboard. A relationship with art - especially since it's all around you - starts with giving the experience your attention.

Go ahead and say, "Hello, [insert art experience]." Ask it some questions.
"Where are you from?"
"What's a nice portrait like you doing in a place like this?"
"How in the heck did you think of that?"

Relationships are a two-way street, right?

It's time to think about approaching art with your own life-long experience. Don't check your baggage at the door. Let your relationships with other people and situations feed your knowledge. Even better, listen to what others see in the art experience. Their observations may highlight something you haven't thought of, or didn't see from your perspective.

This approach to learning was exactly what the first cohort of the Center for Developing Urban Educational Leaders (C-DUEL) did yesterday at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. It was one of two "Creativity & Imagination in Leadership" seminars held in conjunction with the C-DUEL's partnership with the Maxine Green Center for Aesthetic Education and Social Imagination. The second one will be July 11th :


...This is a rare opportunity for participants to expand their awareness of the importance of multiple perspectives, collaboration, risk taking, and reflective practices. We will enjoy a live jazz concert and interact with the performers as to their practice in terms of collaboration, improvisation, etc. We have a final debriefing session as to how these experiences might impact our own practice as leaders and educators. The results, of course, vary from participant to participant but are usually quite powerful and in many cases have a lasting impact. 

The students in the first C-DUEL cohort are amazingly compassionate educational leaders. Through this shared experience, they revealed insight into their sensitivity and awareness of human value in others. I see great things in people who express curiosity about the world, who are also interested in understanding things they don't initially understand - people who approach learning by asking questions. Being open to this way of thinking can only inform their leadership.

You're a leader. Whether you are a long practicing educator, or a student, you are a leader of your own path of knowledge. The question is... do you want to know more?






Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Cinderella - a Slutastic Conversation; part 1

A small group of campus professionals just met to discuss the first 6 chapters of the Peggy Orenstein book, Cinderella Ate My Daughter: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the New Girlie-Girl Culture. The group of all women came from a variety of backgrounds; some mothers, some not but thinking some day maybe, others older than the first generation of Disney marketing targets, a mix of ethnic backgrounds (mostly white - seriously, it's Lehigh) all of them highly educated and passionate about feminism.

But before I get into a recap of the discussion, I want to share a few resources with the readers of this post who may also be reading Orenstein's book in preparation for her visit to campus on September 26th. 

Other book reviews:

Other articles by Orenstein: 
"What's Wrong with Cinderella?" NY Times Magazine, December 24, 2006 - [This may have started the book.] 
"Should the World of Toys be Gender Free?" NY Times Magazine, December 29, 2011.
Or links to her blog which posts her written work, much like a composer's opus is divided into work periods. Here are the titles listed written in 2011 to the present - but not linked for you. I'm going to actually MAKE you click to her blog and surf. Why? This writer is not a one topic trick pony. She also has some very important things to say about breast cancer research and a whole new appropriation of the color pink. More on that after our group discussion finishes next week.

In the last month or so Peggy Orenstein has super charged the conversation about Breast Cancer Research. Those who may be interested in reading the significant NY Times piece April 25, 2013 "Our Feel Good War on Breast Cancer" can read it through this link. With all of the philanthropic work many of our campus sororities do toward raising money for breast cancer research, and the fact that a significant number of our staff have been touched by the disease in multiple ways - the conversation on pink becomes relevant in a whole new perspective. I urge anyone who has interest in Feminism, or public heath to read all of Orenstein's work. If you're on twitter, you don't need to wait for her arrival on campus to engage in conversation. She's pretty accessible already --> @peggyorenstein

Back to a recap of today.

Since we were only discussing the first 6 chapters, we focused on the topics: Disney marketing, princess culture, pink, girlie-behavior, dressing, and "what is normal?" The discussion was led by Brooke DiSipio, Assistant Director of the Lehigh Unviersity Women's Center. We focussed some conversation about what we thought the topics of this book might be reflected on Lehigh's campus. It was a wonderful opportunity for us to consider not only our own "girl" experiences, and (for some of us) our parenting questions about raising girls, but in how the Princess Culture might have impact on current students.

DiSipio shared with us that she's noticing a lot of communication issues with students now. In general, we are seeing more students communicating via text message (and long ones at that) rather than having face to face conversations. DiSipio's area of expertise is in sexuality. She guides female and male students through a tricky time in every person's life. If you are of any generation, think back to your own personal age of sexual awareness; which develops in stages. In a mostly repressed sexual society, how does a person come to terms with being sexual, being in a healthy sexual relationship, and (for lack of better way to say it) being appropriate?

How do we become and behave in our sexuality. In today's young "hook up" culture, how do couples develop relationships beyond sex? It was wonderful to consider how might the issues brought up in Oresntein's book be reflected in what our current students are dealing with? How does the objectification of women (a multi-centuries old issue) impact the independent growth and identity development of our students? How does contemporary culture impact the next generation of leaders? These are issues the staff of the Women's Center face every day. 

Not to put too hard a right turn on the subject - but this conversation made me extremely proud of working in a residential higher educational institution. It's staff and programs like the Women's Center that offer Lehigh students a chance to learn and grown beyond the classroom. The discussions, speakers, and conversations in a room filled with comfortable furniture led by highly skilled counselors and thoughtful academics, add value beyond measure to learning on this campus.

**** personal reflection******

Reading Orenstein's book and articles has me questioning so many things about my own childhood, and how I'm trying to be aware of the "different but informed" environment my husband and I are trying to raised our own children in. We are the parents of 10 year old boy/girl twins. I was thrown head first into gender issues the day they were born. Now, as a Girl Scout Leader, I'm seeing lots of programming coming through that organization to support young women's confidence beyond the Disney Culture these kids grew up with. Most of the girls in our troop have one or more Disney princess gowns in their closet. There's been a Halloween where they've fought over who gets to be Ariel, Aurora, Jasmine or Belle. They also played with Bratz dolls. Their idols are Lady Gaga, Katy Perry, and (God help me) Kei$ha. They sing their lyrics not really knowing what they're singing about. They all want to have a birthday party at Sweet and Sassy and ride in this:

When my daughter came home looking like a cast member of MTV's "Jersey Shore," my husband had to hold me back from hosing down the layers of makeup and hairspray. Seriously.

... I can't wait to hear the conversations with my kids ten years from now. I wonder what experiences they are having now that will inform their cultural observations and reflections of what they thought was important in hind sight. I'm sure they will remember my over-reactions to purchase requests.

One last random thought. Anyone remember this toy form the 1970s? (Growing Up Skipper Doll, released in 1975) This may offer some insight into my own identity developmental confusion...



Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Another degree... really?

When I was an administrator of an arts integration program in Ohio, the president of the organization that oversaw the program said, "You speak too much educational-ese." I thought it odd that a university professor of theatre would say that. Shouldn't a fellow academic understand institutional structure, educational guidelines and best practices for curriculum development? Of course he did- but they were referred differently in his vernacular.

  • "Institutional structure" meant: an "us-vs-them" battle ground between artists who need money to spend on productions, and administrators who can never raise enough money for their needs, and other artists who compete for limited resources. 
  • "Educational guideline" meant tenure and promotion, or departmental accreditation.
  • "Best practices" are artistic reputation specific to genre, or validated through ticket sales. 

When I was in this position, I frequently referred to the 1983 report, A Nation at Risk.  I even read it a few times. (Actually, it's an annual event) The report fuels my passion to make learning meaningful for all ages; not just K-12.

Consider this: "Why can't the audience come to understand artistic intentions by making connections to their own experiences?" Or even more shocking, "If audience members were encouraged to make their own art, might they find professional artist work that much more awesome?"

The response from some artists is an astounding resistance. I'm sure there are many reasons for this. But I've felt a sense of urgency for the past 20 years of my career to make more substantial changes in the places I am now. Why? In all of my training - over 11 years of high quality training - I never received any structure for thinking about how I could work with school teachers, how I would relate to different audiences, or how I could reach outside my disciplinary boundaries. When I did these things, I was a maverick, a trouble maker, or even a blasphemer. *

I'm pretty good at understanding structure, authority, systems and procedures. I'm a musician, after all. Years of practice trained not only my chops and fingers to master control of the bassoon, but how to listen to others around me, know the big picture (musical score), follow the vision of the conductor, etc. Most importantly, I learned to be prepared, be humble, and be like-able enough so that I would either win the audition, or get a call-back. All of this awareness transfers into what I do now.

I also learned how to develop musical relationships with the other musicians. Much of the relationship was based on understanding where we all needed to go together. It wasn't just about what ink was on the page of the second bassoon part. Being in tune, on time, and blending with the other timbres meant developing a hyper awareness of how I fit in the ensemble.

I've reach a point in my work where I'm hyper aware of a need to be much more strategic with understanding school systems, educational guidelines and best practices for arts integration between schools and arts organizations. I also don't see schools as bounded by a K-12 limited time frame. I see birth- through life opportunities; pre-school, higher education, elderhostle. See, I have this vision of what is possible, and I have about 20 years of practical experience supporting the vision. But in order to make some leaps forward, have anything I publish be legitimized by others in the field, I'm going to boot camp.

I seek coaches who are going to help shape my vision into something acceptable to a field of other practitioners. They will provide readings in new disciplines, identify new areas of research and best practices, offer their experiences for inquiry and reflection and more importantly - KICK MY BUTT into publishing. I officially started a new Masters Degree in Educational Leadership this week.

It's not the degree, or the letters. It's academic legitimacy. As much as I think I know what I'm going; in academia, it's all about semantics.

*I should re-read my doctoral research paper on "The Orchestra is nothing but a Tribute Band if they don't Commission New Work."